Following the Money: Emergencies Act Invoked to Expand Anti-Money Laundering Rules

Authors: Zain Rizvi, Léon H. Moubayed, Jack Franklin and Chenyang Li

The Canadian federal government announced this week that it was invoking the never-before-used Emergencies Act1 in response to ongoing blockades and occupations arising out of the self-titled “Freedom Convoy” protests. As part of the emergency declaration, the government announced additional measures to help mitigate the risk of crowdfunding platforms being used to support illegal activity and broaden the scope of Canada’s anti-money laundering (AML) rules to cover crowdfunding platforms and the payment service providers (PSPs) they use.

Emergency Orders

Citing the damage that the blockades have inflicted on Canada’s economy and reputation as a reliable trading partner, the Canadian government declared the public order emergency by way of an order-in-council (Emergency Order) on February 14.2 The Emergency Order grants the Governor in Council broad powers to address the emergency, including by prescribing measures to regulate or prohibit public assembly, directing the provision of services, and – importantly – directing the regulation or prohibition of the use of property. The emergency declaration is effective immediately, but must be brought before each House of Parliament and confirmed within seven sitting days.

Orders-in-council and accompanying regulations implemented under the Emergency Order were registered and became effective on February 15, including the Emergency Measures Regulations,3 which prohibit certain activities related to the blockades, and the Emergency Economic Measures Order,4 which pertains to crowdfunding platforms, PSPs and other financial service providers that may be involved in the flow of funds to persons or entities involved in the blockades.

Obligations Under the Orders

The Emergency Economic Measures Order applies to specified financial entities already subject to the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act5 (PCMLTFA), including banks, credit societies, trust companies, loan companies and securities dealers, as well as entities that may not have been previously subject to the PCMLTFA, including entities that perform “payment functions”6 (i.e., PSPs) and crowdfunding platforms (collectively, Specified Entities). The term “payment functions” is broadly defined, and is largely consistent with the language used in the forthcoming Retail Payments Activities Act (RPAA), which we discussed in our June 2021 bulletin.

Specified Entities are required to determine on a continuing basis whether they are in possession or control of property that is owned, held or controlled by or on behalf of a “designated person” and to take further action to protect against such property being used for an illegal purpose (as more particularly described below). Although the obligation to “determine on a continuing basis” is not specifically described in the emergency orders, Specified Entities may look to guidance provided by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) to regulated financial institutions on the frequency and scope of sanctions screening obligations. Specifically, OSFI encourages such institutions to screen against relevant sanctions lists at least on a weekly basis, and more frequently as circumstances dictate or for larger institutions.

A “designated person” is defined as any person that engages in the activities prohibited by sections 2 to 5 of the Emergency Measures Regulations, including (i) participating in a prohibited public assembly;7 (ii) entering Canada with intent to participate in a prohibited assembly; (iii) travelling to or within an area where such assembly is taking place; or (iv) using, collecting, providing or otherwise making available property to facilitate or participate in any such assembly.

Under the Emergency Economic Measures Order, Specified Entities are required to immediately cease

  1. dealing in any property, wherever situated, that is owned, held or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a designated person or by a person acting on behalf of or at the direction of that designated person;
  2. facilitating any transaction related to the above;
  3. making available any property, including funds or virtual currency, to or for the benefit of a designated person or to a person acting on behalf of or at the direction of a designated person; or
  4. providing any financial or related services to or for the benefit of any designated person or acquire any such services from or for the benefit of any such person or entity.

Notably, no proceedings under the Emergencies Act and no civil proceedings lie against an entity for complying with its obligations under the Emergency Order.

Additional Obligations on Crowdfunding Platforms and PSPs

The Emergency Economic Measures Order also includes directives specific to crowdfunding platforms and PSPs. If a crowdfunding platform or a PSP is in possession or control of property that is owned, held or controlled by or on behalf of a designated person, it must register with the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC), the federal financial intelligence agency, and disclose to the RCMP or CSIS the existence of such property and any information about any transaction or proposed transaction in respect of the property. More generally, crowdfunding platforms and PSPs are now also required to

  • report to FINTRAC every financial transaction that occurs or that is attempted in the course of its activities and in respect of which there are reasonable grounds to suspect is related to the commission or the attempted commission of a money laundering or terrorist financing offence by a designated person; and
  • comply with sections 30(1) and 33(1) of the PCMLTFA, which prescribe reporting requirements applicable to “money services businesses” (MSBs).

Expansion of Canadian AML Regime

In the government press conference announcing the Emergency Order, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Chrystia Freeland indicated that the government would also seek to permanently implement the emergency measures specific to crowdfunding platforms and PSPs through future legislation, resulting in the expansion of Canada’s AML and counter-terrorist financing regimes.

In her address, Minister Freeland acknowledged that the flow of funds to the blockades has highlighted the fact that crowdfunding platforms, and some of the PSPs they use, are not fully captured under the PCMLTFA. Entities subject to the PCMLTFA are required to register with FINTRAC, report large and suspicious transactions, implement compliance programs and satisfy various other reporting and record-keeping requirements.

The Minister’s comments ostensibly refer to the fact that FINTRAC does not consider certain payment processors to be MSBs subject to the requirements under the PCMLTFA. Interpretive guidance published by FINTRAC notes that, while certain entities may engage in the business of remitting or transmitting funds, the transfer of funds itself is merely a corollary of their actual service (payment processing) and, accordingly, such entities are not properly considered to be MSBs – for example, utility payment companies, payroll and commission service companies and, in some cases, entities providing settlements directly to merchants on behalf of the merchant’s customers for the purchase of goods and services.

Looking Ahead

Greater regulation of this subsection of the payments industry was already a priority for the federal government, which intends to bridge this gap with the introduction of the RPAA. As discussed in our June 2021 bulletin, the RPAA is a yet-to-be implemented retail payments oversight framework that will be administered by the Bank of Canada. Once in force, the RPAA is expected to regulate financial technology (fintech) companies operating in the payments space, including payment processors and other PSPs that may not otherwise be subject to the PCMLTFA. It remains to be seen how the RPAA will fit together with any future legislation that Minister Freeland indicated will make some of the emergency measures permanent.

As a result of the Emergency Economic Measures Order, crowdfunding platforms and their providers that have previously operated outside of the PCMLTFA may now be required to register with FINTRAC and comply with its requirements. The potential changes to the PCMLTFA, together with the forthcoming RPAA, signal that these entities, which previously operated in a regulatory grey zone, will need a robust framework to ensure compliance with both regimes in the future.

1 RSC, 1985, c 22 (4th Supp.).

2 PC Number: 2022-0106.

3 SOR/2022-21.

4 SOR/2022-22.

5 SC 2000, c 17.

6 The term “payment functions” is defined in the Emergency Economic Measures Order: to include (i) the provision or maintenance of an account that, in relation to an electronic funds transfer, is held on behalf of one or more end users; (ii) the holding of funds on behalf of an end user until they are withdrawn by the end user or transferred to another individual or entity; (iii) the initiation of an electronic funds transfer at the request of an end user; (iv) the authorization of an electronic funds transfer or the transmission, reception or facilitation of an instruction in relation to an electronic funds transfer; or (v) the provision of clearing or settlement services.

7 The Emergency Measures Regulations prohibit a person from participating in a public assembly that “may reasonably be expected to lead to a breach of the peace by: (a) the serious disruption of the movement of persons or goods or the serious interference with trade; (b) the interference with the functioning of critical infrastructure; or (c) the support of the threat or use of acts of serious violence against persons or property."

Key Contacts

Zain Rizvi
Zain Rizvi



Léon H. Moubayed
Léon H. Moubayed


514.841.6461 | 416.863.5582


Citibank Gets Its Money Back

Sept. 15, 2022 - A February 16, 2021 decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York held, in In re Citibank August 11, 2020 Wire Transfers, 520 F. Supp. 3d 390, that lenders who received almost $900 million mistakenly wired to them by Citibank (the administrative...

First Remediation Agreement under the Canadian Criminal Code: Key Takeaways

June 14, 2022 - The Superior Court of Québec recently published its reasons1 approving Canada’s first remediation agreement under the Criminal Code, which is Canada’s version of a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA). In his reasons, the Honourable Justice Eric Downs provided an extensive...