July 03, 2020 - The Supreme Court of Canada has released its highly anticipated decision in Uber Technologies Inc. v David Heller (Uber), ruling that a proposed class action on behalf of Uber drivers can proceed despite an arbitration clause contained in the standard form agreement between drivers and...
Canada’s Top Court Releases Precedent-Setting Decision on Litigation Funding and a Court’s Discretion in Restructuring Process
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in 9354-9186 Québec Inc. v Callidus Capital Corporation unanimously overturned a unanimous decision of the Québec Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court’s decision, released on January 23, 2020, was issued from the bench with reasons to follow.
The reasons will be important for the insolvency bar since they are expected to clarify the rules governing third-party litigation funding in an insolvency context. They are also expected to confirm that under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, a supervising judge has wide discretion to render any appropriate order to protect the integrity and fairness of a restructuring process. In addition, the reasons may provide important guidance regarding the principles governing creditors’ vote in a restructuring context.
The decision is significant because it is the first time Canada’s highest court has considered litigation funding in any context. The legal community will benefit from the Supreme Court’s analysis when it releases its written reasons for this matter in the coming months.
Christian Lachance, Jean-Philippe Groleau, Gabriel Lavery Lepage and Hannah Toledano successfully represented the plaintiffs in this matter.
June 17, 2020 - Translation in progress. Dans l’affaire Maltais c. Procureure générale du Québec, 2020 QCCA 715, la Cour d’appel du Québec (la « Cour ») a rendu un arrêt important en matière de responsabilité de l’État. Cet arrêt clarifie l’applicabilité au gouvernement du régime de...