Oct. 30, 2020 - Across the globe, courts are rapidly adapting their practices and procedures, initially in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and now to the gradual resumption of activities and easing of restrictions. As Canadian provinces gradually move toward reopening, courts have also begun to reopen their...
Canada’s Top Court Provides Crucial Guidance on the Conduct of Insolvency Proceedings
The Supreme Court of Canada delivered its reasons today in 9354-9186 Québec inc. v Callidus Capital Corp., 2020 SCC 10, after having unanimously allowed the appeals from the bench on January 9, 2020. Davies represented the principal – and successful – appellants in this matter.1
In its reasons, which were delivered by Chief Justice Wagner and Justice Moldaver, the Supreme Court laid out key principles for the conduct of insolvency proceedings (including proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act [CCAA]):
- Parties in insolvency proceedings must always be mindful of the requirement to act diligently, in good faith and in furtherance of the insolvency statute’s objectives, lest they lose rights. This means that pursuing aggressive strategies that fail to meet this threshold is risky.
- Judges supervising CCAA proceedings have broad discretion to make a variety of orders that respond to the circumstances of each case. A high degree of deference is owed by appellate courts to the discretionary decisions of supervisory judges.
- The CCAA does not, as a general rule, prevent a creditor from voting on the plan of arrangement it sponsors. However, the supervising judge may exercise discretion to bar a creditor from voting when this creditor is acting for an improper purpose.
- The CCAA may properly be used to effect a liquidation of the debtor company’s assets.
- A plan of arrangement requires at least some form of compromise of creditors’ rights. Therefore, a third-party litigation funding agreement may or may not constitute a plan of arrangement, depending on the circumstances of that case.
- Interim financing is not limited to providing debtor companies with immediate operating capital. It may also be used to realize the value of a debtor’s assets, including litigation assets, and may therefore take the form of third-party litigation funding.
This decision is important for the legal community because it clarifies a number of significant elements regarding the conduct of insolvency proceedings.
Oct. 08, 2020 - In a case successfully argued by Davies, the Court of Québec concluded that the prosecution infringed the right of the accused to be tried within a reasonable time and, as a result, ordered (published in French) a stay of proceedings and charges. This is an important decision in that it deals...