Article

Indirect Purchaser Claims

Authors: Adam F. Fanaki and Chantelle (Spagnola) Cseh

In its first decisions in over 20 years addressing private competition law claims, the Supreme Court of Canada found that indirect purchasers (such as consumers and retailers) are entitled to assert claims for damages and restitution in class actions relying upon alleged competition law offences. This article discusses the significance of these highly anticipated decisions (Infineon Technologies AG v Option Consommateurs 2013 SCC 59; Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd v Microsoft Corporation 2013 SCC 57; and Sun-Rype Products Ltd v Archer Daniels Midland Company 2013 SCC 58) and what the implications could be for competition policy and class certification in Canada.

Download this article.

Key Contacts

Adam F. Fanaki
Adam F. Fanaki

Partner (In Memoriam)

416.863.5564

Related

Top Competition and Foreign Investment Review Trends and Issues for 2020

Jan. 21, 2020 - In our annual forecast of the year ahead for Canadian competition and foreign investment review law, we evaluate how developments in 2019 will influence these areas of the law in 2020. We discuss below the main issues and trends to watch for this year. Continued Focus on Enforcement in the...