Article

Indirect Purchaser Claims

Authors: Adam F. Fanaki and Chantelle (Spagnola) Cseh

In its first decisions in over 20 years addressing private competition law claims, the Supreme Court of Canada found that indirect purchasers (such as consumers and retailers) are entitled to assert claims for damages and restitution in class actions relying upon alleged competition law offences. This article discusses the significance of these highly anticipated decisions (Infineon Technologies AG v Option Consommateurs 2013 SCC 59; Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd v Microsoft Corporation 2013 SCC 57; and Sun-Rype Products Ltd v Archer Daniels Midland Company 2013 SCC 58) and what the implications could be for competition policy and class certification in Canada.

Download this article.

Key Contacts

Related

Small Mergers Loom Large on Canadian Competition Bureau’s Radar

Sept. 30, 2019 - Canada’s Competition Bureau is actively seeking and reviewing smaller acquisitions that may not exceed pre-merger notification thresholds under the Competition Act but that may nonetheless raise substantive competition issues. The Bureau’s demonstrated interest in evaluating smaller mergers...

Top Court Expands Scope of Potential Liability in Price-Fixing Class Actions

Sept. 24, 2019 - The Supreme Court of Canada has released its long-awaited decision in two companion appeals that have significant implications for class actions alleging conduct that contravenes the criminal provisions found in Part VI of the Competition Act (Act). In its decision in Pioneer Corporation...